Head to head
Clize vs Sitemap Stats
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-world actions for AI coding agents: domains, email, deploys, payments, media, and SEO/GEO.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Sitemap Stats MCP — reads a domain's sitemap(s) and reports their STRUCTURE,
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clize (86/100 against 77). Sitemap Stats is hosted and callable through the gateway; Clize runs on your own machine.
| Clize | Sitemap Stats | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.7k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 37 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |