Mmcp.market

Head to head

Cloakcheck vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Cloakcheckapp.vercel.cloakcheck-wheat/cloakcheck
C
No reviews yet

Scan a page for hidden prompt-injection payloads targeting AI agents.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 69). Cloakcheck is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 CloakcheckPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–136
Downloads / week–1.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools113
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Cloakcheck vs prompt-protectionCloakcheck vs mcpmCloakcheck vs Agent-Native AnalyticsCloakcheck vs ImageCloakcheck vs llmtrimAll AI and agents servers