Head to head
CloudeIDE vs Phosphor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deploy from your terminal, and give an AI coding agent the same abilities over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hosts, metrics, Docker and authorized_keys over a macOS terminal's live SSH connections
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phosphor (88/100 against 77).
| CloudeIDE | Phosphor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 46 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | — |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-02 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |