Head to head
Conduit Mail vs Silica Core
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Your mailbox for MCP clients: search, read, draft, send, rules and notes. Sending is off by default.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Silica Core (92/100 against 70). Conduit Mail is hosted and callable through the gateway; Silica Core runs on your own machine. Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Conduit Mail | Silica Core | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 60 |
| Downloads / week | – | 396 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |