Head to head
Connskill Growth vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local market checks, rankings and keyword research as JSON, paid per call via x402 in USDC on Base.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call AI + web + on-chain tools over x402 (USDC on Base): LLM, SEO, extract, token safety.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 78 out of 100).
| Connskill Growth | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 201 | 40 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-23 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |