Mmcp.market

Head to head

ContextStream MCP Server vs Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

ContextStream MCP Serverio.github.contextstream/mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Project memory, semantic code search, and grounded agent context.

Full listing
Hicortex — AI Fleet Memoryio.github.gamaze-labs/hicortex
C
No reviews yet

Shared fleet memory for AI agents: nightly self-correction, recall every prompt (supported agents).

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ContextStream MCP Server (96/100 against 55). ContextStream MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory runs on your own machine. ContextStream MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 ContextStream MCP ServerHicortex — AI Fleet Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA96/100C55/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars432
Downloads / week9641.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—11
Write actions—2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-152026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

ContextStream MCP Server vs ProjectmemContextStream MCP Server vs Linksee MemoryContextStream MCP Server vs Agent Memory OsContextStream MCP Server vs IWEContextStream MCP Server vs Google SurfAll AI and agents servers