Head to head
ContextStream MCP Server vs Link
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local personal memory for agents as MCP tools — remember, recall, search, context, graph traversal.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Link (92/100 against 62).
| ContextStream MCP Server | Link | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 43 | 182 |
| Downloads / week | 588 | 197 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |