Head to head
katra vs no_human
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A committed markdown dev log and task graph that agents read and write over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours katra (88/100 against 75). no_human has noticeably more public adoption.
| katra | no_human | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 317 |
| Downloads / week | – | 330 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |