Head to head
MCP vs Flowzap
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
EU-native web scraping for AI agents. scrape pages, map sites, run background jobs, check usage.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Create workflow, sequence, architecture, and mind map diagrams via AI assistants.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 86 out of 100). Flowzap is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. Flowzap has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Flowzap | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 50 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | 13 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |