Head to head
CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server vs Trent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connects AI agents with CrowdStrike Falcon for security analysis and automation.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 85). Trent is hosted and callable through the gateway; CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server runs on your own machine. CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server | Trent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 257 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | 12k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Security | Security |