Mmcp.market

Head to head

Mailwarden vs Local

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Mailwardenio.github.csitte/mailwarden
A
No reviews yet

Gmail MCP server for email triage: search, labels, archive, trash, unsubscribe, snooze.

Full listing
Localcom.local-mcp/local-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Let ChatGPT, Claude & Cursor use your Mac: email, calendar, iMessage, Teams, files. Local, free.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mailwarden (92/100 against 68). Local is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mailwarden runs on your own machine. Local has noticeably more public adoption.

 MailwardenLocal
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C68/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars055
Downloads / week3502.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryEmailEmail

Other comparisons

Mailwarden vs Agent-Native MailMailwarden vs FluxmailMailwarden vs IMAP MCP ProMailwarden vs Mailbox MCPMailwarden vs SignatureForeverAll Email servers