Mmcp.market

Head to head

Mailwarden vs PipesHub

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Mailwardenio.github.csitte/mailwarden
A
No reviews yet

Gmail MCP server for email triage: search, labels, archive, trash, unsubscribe, snooze.

Full listing
PipesHubio.github.pipeshub-ai/mcp
C
No reviews yet

Permissioned search and cited answers over Slack, Drive, Gmail, Jira, and 50+ workplace sources.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mailwarden (92/100 against 67). PipesHub is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mailwarden runs on your own machine.

 MailwardenPipesHub
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C67/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars06
Downloads / week350–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-16
CategoryEmailEmail

Other comparisons

Mailwarden vs Agent-Native MailMailwarden vs FluxmailMailwarden vs IMAP MCP ProMailwarden vs Mailbox MCPMailwarden vs SignatureForeverAll Email servers