Head to head
openchronicle-mcp vs Biorxiv
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Memory database for LLM agents — persistent semantic + keyword memory, project namespacing, served o
Full listingNo reviews yet
Search and retrieve bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints — by DOI, date interval, or keyword — via MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 93 out of 100). Biorxiv is hosted and callable through the gateway; openchronicle-mcp runs on your own machine.
| openchronicle-mcp | Biorxiv | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 16 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 131 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 17 | 6 |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |