Mmcp.market

Head to head

SQL Server MCP vs Neon

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SQL Server MCPio.github.cvelasquez/mcp-sqlserver
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for DBAs running dozens of SQL Server instances: grouped connections, plans, indexes

Full listing
Neoncom.neon/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 83). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; SQL Server MCP runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.

 SQL Server MCPNeon
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A97/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars2648
Downloads / week147–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

SQL Server MCP vs SupabaseSQL Server MCP vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesSQL Server MCP vs GeoLensSQL Server MCP vs Magic CloudSQL Server MCP vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers