Head to head
Arxiv vs Peer Research Papers MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Arxiv (93/100 against 70). Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Peer Research Papers MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 6 | – |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |