Head to head
Bluesky vs X (Twitter)
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, read and publish X posts and manage users, lists and media via the X API v2.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Bluesky (86/100 against 73). Bluesky is hosted and callable through the gateway; X (Twitter) runs on your own machine.
| Bluesky | X (Twitter) | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 178 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |