Mmcp.market

Head to head

Browser Compat vs MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Browser Compatio.github.cyanheads/browser-compat-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Browser compatibility and Baseline status for any web feature — offline, from bundled MDN data.

Full listing
MCPai.foura/mcp
B
No reviews yet

Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Browser Compat (92/100 against 84). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Browser Compat runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Browser CompatMCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B84/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars04
Downloads / week–444
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—4
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-17
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Browser Compat vs SeleniumBase MCPBrowser Compat vs AIHawkBrowser Compat vs ScrapelessBrowser Compat vs Web Browser (kogiQA)Browser Compat vs shaft-mcpAll Scraping and browsing servers