Head to head
Clinicaltrialsgov vs Octobrain
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search ClinicalTrials.gov — find studies, retrieve results, match patients to eligible trials.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for AI assistants with semantic search and knowledge graph relationships.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (93 and 94 out of 100). Clinicaltrialsgov is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octobrain runs on your own machine. Clinicaltrialsgov has noticeably more public adoption.
| Clinicaltrialsgov | Octobrain | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 94 | 14 |
| Downloads / week | 5.7k | 411 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |