Mmcp.market

Head to head

Crossref vs N-able N-central MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Crossrefio.github.cyanheads/crossref-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Resolve DOIs, search ~155M scholarly works, and fetch references via the Crossref REST API.

Full listing
N-able N-central MCPio.github.Servosity/n-central-mcp
B
No reviews yet

N-central REST API with an offline org-tree mirror, cross-tenant search, and a JWT-expiry guardian.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Crossref (93/100 against 75). Crossref is hosted and callable through the gateway; N-able N-central MCP runs on your own machine.

 CrossrefN-able N-central MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA93/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars341
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools7—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

Crossref vs CiteNexusCrossref vs Apple ContactsCrossref vs AI Pensieve MCPCrossref vs Pasal.id — Indonesian LawCrossref vs Open EconomicsAll Web search servers