Head to head
Eur Lex vs Lacuna Research MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search EU legislation, CJEU case law, and treaties; traverse CELLAR graph; browse EuroVoc concepts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lacuna Research MCP (94/100 against 86). Eur Lex is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lacuna Research MCP runs on your own machine. Eur Lex has noticeably more public adoption.
| Eur Lex | Lacuna Research MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 814 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |