Head to head
Faostat vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 62). Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Faostat | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | 180 | 80k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |