Head to head
Obsidian vs TaScan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read, write, search, and surgically edit Obsidian notes, tags, and frontmatter via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
36 MCP tools for projects, tasks, workers, QR/NFC tags, and AI remediation. Task. Scan. Done.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 86 out of 100). TaScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian runs on your own machine. Obsidian has noticeably more public adoption.
| Obsidian | TaScan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 682 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 5.5k | 573 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 80 |
| Write actions | — | 23 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |