Head to head
Pentest vs Trooth
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pentest
?io.github.cyanheads/pentest-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Trooth has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pentest | Trooth | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A85/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |