Head to head
Pubmed vs c3fst Biomedical Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search PubMed/Europe PMC, fetch articles and full text (PMC/EPMC/Unpaywall), citations, MeSH terms.
Full listingc3fst Biomedical Search
Cio.github.mjandrews1/c3fst-biomedical-searchNo reviews yet
Biomedical search: FDA drugs, MeSH headings, ClinVar genomic variants with BM25 ranking.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pubmed (93/100 against 65). Pubmed is hosted and callable through the gateway; c3fst Biomedical Search runs on your own machine. Pubmed has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pubmed | c3fst Biomedical Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 148 | – |
| Downloads / week | 8.0k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 11 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |