Head to head
Smithsonian vs Sap Adt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search 14.5M Smithsonian Open Access objects, get CC0 images, find cross-collection connections.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Give Claude live access to SAP ABAP via ADT: read, search, check, test, and edit objects.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Smithsonian (93/100 against 74). Smithsonian is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sap Adt runs on your own machine.
| Smithsonian | Sap Adt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 16 |
| Downloads / week | 180 | 54 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 58 |
| Write actions | — | 12 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |