Mmcp.market

Head to head

Workflows vs Asc

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Workflowsio.github.cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Store, query, and create YAML workflow playbooks for LLM agents.

Full listing
Ascio.github.pofky/asc-mcp
B
No reviews yet

41 tools to ship an App Store release: metadata, screenshots, builds, TestFlight, IAP, submit.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Workflows (92/100 against 83). Workflows has noticeably more public adoption.

 WorkflowsAsc
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars310
Downloads / week560–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—41
Write actions—8
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryE-commerceE-commerce

Other comparisons

Workflows vs ApifyWorkflows vs HeimdallWorkflows vs BuywhereWorkflows vs LemonSqueezy MCP ServerWorkflows vs StoreliftAll E-commerce servers