Head to head
Scrapling MCP Server vs Firebase Deploy Leak Audit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reads firebase.json and names the files your next firebase deploy would publish to the open web
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 89 out of 100). Scrapling MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Scrapling MCP Server | Firebase Deploy Leak Audit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 83k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 212k | 383 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | BSD-3-Clause | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |