Mmcp.market

Head to head

SearXNG vs SearXNG Search

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SearXNGio.github.danchev/searxng
A
No reviews yet

Privacy-friendly web search through a configurable SearXNG instance.

Full listing
SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG (92/100 against 83). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 SearXNGSearXNG Search
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars01.2k
Downloads / week5009.2k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools14
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-112026-09-18
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

SearXNG vs Zotero MCPSearXNG vs RabbytteSearXNG vs Magpie SearchSearXNG vs WebSearch MCP ServerAll Web search servers