Head to head
Darwin vs Silica Core
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public AI capabilities and coordinate approved work through Darwin's Search to Act interface.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Retrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Silica Core (92/100 against 60). Darwin is hosted and callable through the gateway; Silica Core runs on your own machine. Silica Core has noticeably more public adoption.
| Darwin | Silica Core | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 60 |
| Downloads / week | – | 396 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |