Mmcp.market

Head to head

Security Intel MCP vs HoneyLabs

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Security Intel MCPcom.datakoot/cve-vulnerability-lookup
A
No reviews yet

CVE lookups (NVD) and dependency-manifest audits (OSV) for AI agents. No API keys.

Full listing
HoneyLabsnet.honeylabs/mcp
B
No reviews yet

Honeypot probe data: IP reputation, scanners, CVE probing, TLS and SSH fingerprints.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Intel MCP (89/100 against 81).

 Security Intel MCPHoneyLabs
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100B81/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars02
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools59
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-152026-09-20
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Security Intel MCP vs npm Registry MCP ServerSecurity Intel MCP vs grim-mcpSecurity Intel MCP vs Security Txt Cra LintSecurity Intel MCP vs Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCPSecurity Intel MCP vs Presend MCP ServerAll Security servers