Mmcp.market

Head to head

Browser Automation vs Playwright

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Browser Automationio.github.DataLeadsPRO/browser-automation
B
No reviews yet

Programmatic headless browser sessions: create, interact, browse, and extract - rendered in a real

Full listing
Playwrightio.github.microsoft/playwright-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Playwright Tools for MCP

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Playwright (94/100 against 80). Browser Automation is hosted and callable through the gateway; Playwright runs on your own machine. Playwright has noticeably more public adoption.

 Browser AutomationPlaywright
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB80/100A94/100
AdoptionNewWidely used
GitHub stars037k
Downloads / week6.0M
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5
Write actions2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-172026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons