Head to head
Screenshot vs CRW Web Scraper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Screenshot
Bio.github.DataLeadsPRO/screenshotNo reviews yet
Pixel-perfect webpage screenshots rendered in a real browser, full-page or viewport, via one POST.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRW Web Scraper (88/100 against 80). Screenshot is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRW Web Scraper runs on your own machine. CRW Web Scraper has noticeably more public adoption.
| Screenshot | CRW Web Scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1.1k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |