Head to head
Web Scraper vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Web Scraper
Aio.github.DataLeadsPRO/web-scraperNo reviews yet
Fetch, crawl, and browse protected pages with anti-bot handling - renders in a real browser and
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 81 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Web Scraper | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 451 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |