Head to head
MCP vs MailMask
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
20 domain recon tools for AI agents: DNS, SSL, headers, email, subdomains, lookalikes, changes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Email for agents: domains, aliases, IMAP mailboxes, DNS, sending and webhooks via one API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 85 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | MailMask | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 559 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 20 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category |