Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP vs HOL Guard

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCPcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing
HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
A
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 86). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; HOL Guard runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCPHOL Guard
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA99/100A86/100
AdoptionEstablishedEstablished
GitHub stars533630
Downloads / week297–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—6
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

MCP vs Agent-Native ChatMCP vs ProjectmemMCP vs LockstepMCP vs FormioMCP vs MCP ServerAll AI and agents servers