Head to head
MCP vs Datawrapper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and app for creating Datawrapper charts using AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 83). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Datawrapper runs on your own machine.
| MCP | Datawrapper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 55 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | 979 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |