Head to head
MCP vs Pearl
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pearl places, table availability, and confirmed visit, save and trip actions for reviewed hosts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (99 and 95 out of 100). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Pearl | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |