Head to head
upAPI vs Twitter/X MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
All public upAPI operations as MCP tools: web scraping, search, screenshots, PDF, OCR and more.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read public X posts, replies, profiles, and search results through Rettiwt or the official API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upAPI (99/100 against 83). upAPI is hosted and callable through the gateway; Twitter/X MCP runs on your own machine.
| upAPI | Twitter/X MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 213 | 23 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | ISC |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |