Head to head
KATA Research Automation vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
KATA Research Automation
Cio.github.dharan1007/kataNo reviews yet
Deterministic research automation with live OpenAlex search and reusable workflow programs.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinysearch (82/100 against 57). KATA Research Automation is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine. Tinysearch has noticeably more public adoption.
| KATA Research Automation | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 229 |
| Downloads / week | – | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | 5 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |