Head to head
DidWork vs Mockserver
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verify that an agent's claimed outcome actually happened, using independently gathered evidence
Full listing
No reviews yet
Mock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Mockserver (93/100 against 80). Mockserver has noticeably more public adoption.
| DidWork | Mockserver | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 5.0k |
| Downloads / week | 96 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |