Head to head
Digital Experts Hypotheses vs Superagnt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Open data: 1,590 JTBD hypotheses with cold-traffic test results and cost per lead. CC BY 4.0
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI agent toolkit: live social media data, lead enrichment + email finder, Postgres DB, webhooks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Superagnt (98/100 against 69). Superagnt has noticeably more public adoption.
| Digital Experts Hypotheses | Superagnt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |