Head to head
MCP Surface Lint vs Designesy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Statically audits MCP tool surfaces for token cost, schema quality, and design issues.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Score any URL against a real design contract — 42 checks, A-F grade, token + motion validation.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 91 out of 100).
| MCP Surface Lint | Designesy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 62 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 1 | 17 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Media | Media |