Mmcp.market

Head to head

Openshift vs Palinode

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Openshiftio.github.dockndevai/mcp-openshift
B
No reviews yet

Safe-by-default MCP for OpenShift / Kubernetes: projects, pods, logs, deployments, routes.

Full listing
Palinodeio.github.phasespace-labs/palinode
C
No reviews yet

Inspectable, correctable project memory in git-versioned Markdown for AI agents.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Openshift (80/100 against 66). Palinode has noticeably more public adoption.

 OpenshiftPalinode
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB80/100C66/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars040
Downloads / week–503
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—3
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Openshift vs KubernetesOpenshift vs ServonautOpenshift vs Agent MemoryOpenshift vs GitlabOpenshift vs Radar Kubernetes MCP ServerAll Developer tools servers