Head to head
yutu vs Transcriptor MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Transcriptor MCP (97/100 against 85). Transcriptor MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; yutu runs on your own machine. yutu has noticeably more public adoption.
| yutu | Transcriptor MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 690 | 21 |
| Downloads / week | 80 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Media | Media |