Head to head
ReviewGuard vs GitHub
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Safety boundary for agent written GitHub PR reviews: pending and invisible, submitting is opt-in
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHub (98/100 against 85). GitHub is hosted and callable through the gateway; ReviewGuard runs on your own machine. GitHub has noticeably more public adoption.
| ReviewGuard | GitHub | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 33k |
| Downloads / week | 40 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |