Head to head
Emailchaser vs Superagnt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Run cold email outbound from an AI agent: campaigns, leads, replies, sender accounts, autopilot.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI agent toolkit: live social media data, lead enrichment + email finder, Postgres DB, webhooks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Superagnt (98/100 against 64). Superagnt has noticeably more public adoption.
| Emailchaser | Superagnt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C64/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 95 | — |
| Write actions | 44 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |