Head to head
Docs vs Sema
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and read Empryo's documentation. Read-only, no auth, no local access.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP tools for Sema — eval, compile, build, format, and docs for a Lisp with LLM primitives.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Docs (89/100 against 78). Docs is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sema runs on your own machine. Docs has noticeably more public adoption.
| Docs | Sema | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.3k | 51 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |