Head to head
Enclave402 vs Protect
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Enclave402
Ccom.enclave402/enclave402No reviews yet
Pay-per-call agent tools: Polymarket signals, IPFS pinning, EIP-712 attestations. USDC on Base.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (69 and 65 out of 100). Enclave402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.
| Enclave402 | Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C69/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |