Head to head
Cited vs DocPull
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Cited
Bio.github.entradox/cited-visibility-scannerNo reviews yet
AI-answer-engine visibility scans for local businesses, as agent tools
Full listing
No reviews yet
Sync public web sources into cited context packs for AI agents, RAG, and MCP clients.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (79 and 83 out of 100). Cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; DocPull runs on your own machine. DocPull has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cited | DocPull | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 25 |
| Downloads / week | – | 88 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | 12 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |