Mmcp.market

Head to head

Equalang vs FunASR

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Equalangio.github.equalang-ai/equalang-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Translate documents, subtitles, pictures, audio and video with layout kept; transcribe recordings.

Full listing
FunASRio.github.modelscope/funasr-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Transcribe local audio with FunASR and SenseVoice using private, on-device inference.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours FunASR (90/100 against 77). FunASR has noticeably more public adoption.

 EqualangFunASR
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A90/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars021k
Downloads / week512–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools8—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-24
CategoryMediaMedia

Other comparisons

Equalang vs JusttranscribeEqualang vs NotebookLM MCPEqualang vs TalkthroughEqualang vs Bilibili MCP ServerEqualang vs RendobarAll Media servers